L42 太阳系有个“外壳”？

    李淑玮 陈理士

摘    要 当前出现了“太阳系在120亿公里处有一个高密度外壳”、“空间仅有一个太阳系， 其余星辰乃是图象、并非真实”等“理论”，本文认为，这些“理论”乃是缺理的误论。

关键词 太阳系外壳 

　　“太阳系有外壳”、“宇宙只有一个太阳系，其余星辰乃是图像不是真实”等“理论”已在有些人中酝酿了几十年，其“依据”是：从月亮上看不到星星，由此怀疑宇宙星辰存在的真实性，所好其“依据”以往被保密，无法用作“证据”，物理理论才太平了这许多年。近来，在传播“在月亮上看不到星星”的同时，“太阳系有外壳理论”也昂然上市。

　　想当年，发现了“远星红移”、加速器中粒子不能“超过光速”、物质不知何来的巨大原子能、在威尔逊云室中粒子迹线出现中断等令人“不解”的困惑——对于有些人，这些至今似乎依然“不解”——由此，提出了“拆东墙补西墙”式的“质量可变理论”，一百年来，虽然让人们感到上述问题“已经”得到“解答”，但是，由于没有从物理机理上真正找到原因，更重要的是弃置了物质不灭和能量不灭两项基础自然规律，使想象和轻率的“理论”得以冠冕堂皇地登堂入室，如：“远星红移=远星高速离去=宇宙发生过大爆炸”、“宇宙大爆炸前，现在宇宙的全部物质都压缩在一个理论的点里”、“在五维空间中我们的宇宙同隐宇宙相撞产生了现在的宇宙”、“宇宙物质总量中，暗物质暗能量占90%以上”、“时间可以伸缩、跨越、可形成通道”、“空间已超过11维”等等本属于“科幻”类型的“理论”冠冕堂皇地进入物理理论主流。

　　用基础自然规律加以衡量，这些“理论”没有一则能够站住脚；尊重基础自然规律，没有一则可以堂而皇之的提得出来！可以看出，近代物理学在取得辉煌成就的同时，其基础理论中也掺入了水分。

　　现在可以完全不背离两项自然规律 (物质不灭、能量不灭) 而从机理上解释当年的那些“困惑”，无人可以切实地证明“两个不灭规律”有何不妥之处。理智的思考，我们理当立即恢复对于基础物理规律的尊重呢？还是继续放任想象力在科幻中翱翔并且让其“成果”不受衡量地进入“理论”呢？

　　上述这些，理应成为借鉴，像数学界那样严肃、认真地对待理论。现实好像并非如此，今天，人们获知了宇宙飞船到达120亿公里时速度已大大下降、从月球上看不到满天星斗，由此出来了“太阳系有外壳”、“宇宙只有一个太阳系”、“地球上看到的星空乃是电影图像而非真像”等等“理论”。

　　对于以上“月球上看不到满天星斗、飞船在空间减速”等现象需要从机理角度分析原因。上述“太阳系有外壳”、“宇宙只有一个太阳系”显然属于驰骋想象的推测，过急地提出的见解和判断，这种片面性做法难免给已经“含有水分”的物理基础理论继续“注水”。

　　 现在分析， 月亮上看不到星星和120亿公里之外回头不能看到太阳的原因何在？回答此二问题仅需要用经典物理学的基础理论。

　　在地球上任何情况下都能看到星星吗？非也，只在“夜”空中可以看到星星，而且星星的数量同月亮的有无、明暗相关。在月明星稀之夜，绝大部分星星都从夜空中“消失”了！人们以往为何不怀疑它们是否客观存在、仅仅是“电影图像”？这是否由于凭借物理知识可以相信月明之夜所以星稀乃是一个视觉对比度的问题。

　　远星的光波到达地球时已经十分微弱，而且，一颗十光年外的远星，在人类视网膜上的图像只有10-6（-6次方）毫米大小，超出了视觉分辨的能力，因此，通常看到的星星并非按照几何光学生成的远星图像而乃是衍射光斑，此光斑的微弱亮度恰好能够使视觉神经、照相底片“感光”。因此，从推理角度说，可能有更多的远星因为更远，在夜空中看不到它们，就是说，宇宙的规模可能要比星图上呈现的大的多。

　　但“月明星稀”现象好像未能提供启发。“月球上看不到星星”却颠覆了某些学者的理念，他们以为在月球上“看不见”就等于“不存在”。在地球上能看到不算，从射电望远镜中能够觉察、接受到它们的电磁波以及引力波、宇宙射线等信息同样不算！

　　其实，在月球上“看不见”乃是一种现象，需要加以分析。现象的不同意味着情况有所不同，地球的天空与月亮的天空有何不同？主要不同在于地球外围存在大气层而月球上没有，至于宇宙尘，到处天空中都有。

　　地球天空中的大气层在白天散射阳光，呈现蔚蓝色，夜晚散射月光呈现深蓝以至黑色；天空中如果仅有宇宙尘，只有少数达到光波波长的颗粒能够散射阳光，极其微弱，因此，在没有大气层的月球天空，大白天天空看上去是黑色的，但由于宇宙尘的微弱散射，不会是绝对地黑，可是能够超过远星的微弱光波，这就是月亮的白天在黑色背景中看不到星星的原因，如果在月亮的夜晚（没有大气层），天空比地球还要黑，天空中星星数量应当比地球多。

　　地球上的“三五月明之夜”，明月当空就可以使大多数星星隐而不见，月亮上旭日在天见不到星星难道异常吗？因此，从地球夜空中看到星星和从月球“白天”的黑色背景中看不到星星分别有不同机理，都不应令人困惑。

　　二者都应是“夜晚”可以看到星星，而且用相同的望远镜，在月球上“夜晚”看到的星星数量应当比地球上看到的多。

　　因为“月球上看不到星星”——其实只是月球上大白天看不到星星——而否定地球上夜空中看到的宇宙星辰的真实性,这乃是一种不正确的推理判断。

至于从120亿公里外能不能看到太阳，理论上应该“能够看到”，为什么宇宙飞船上的望远镜 “回过头来”没有看到太阳？这里需要落实：是所有的星星一律看不见还是仅仅没有看到太阳？二是望远镜平台的惯性体系能够达到多大的稳定性？能不能保证“回过头来”太阳恰好出现在视野中？如果仪器保证不了这一精度，太阳在望远镜中仅相当于在地球上看到的土星，在空间那么多星星中并不特别耀眼，所以，在此情况下“看不到”容易发生，“看到”却需要下功夫。

　　以上分析了“月亮上看不到星星”的原因，说明了“月亮上看不到”和地球上能看到各有原因，不足为怪，不应当因此得到星星仅是图像而不是客观天体和“太阳系有壳”的判断。

　　此外，为什么宇宙飞船到了120亿公里处速度大大下降？

已经测量到宇宙飞船在空间微微减速而不是保持理论上的“惯性”。达到120亿公里的远处时，速度已接近于零。为什么？有人回答说，在120亿那里，物质密度很大，围绕着太阳系，成为太阳系的“外壳”，进一步的推论是：“宇宙中只有一个太阳系”，星系图像统统只是映在“壳”上的“电影图像”而不是真实。

　　现有理论确实存在局限，难以解释所发现的现象，但是，现有理论也确实有许多扎实之处不容忽视，忽视它们等于关上认识宇宙之窗，在宇宙海洋中只看到一滴水似地仅看到了太阳系，是否也太离谱了。说“众星系”客观存在不仅仅是因为看到它们在夜空中的图像而是许多许多年来多方面研究探索的成果。

　　关于“宇宙飞船到达120亿公里处为什么会减速”之所以成为问题，是由于我们认为宇宙飞船离开太阳系后完全按照惯性飞行,似乎不该减速。其实，在太空中绝对的、理论上的惯性飞行并不存在，主要原因有二：一是太空中“布满”电子、宇宙尘、宇宙射线和散布着星际物质，尽管密度很小，但是，使宇宙飞船产生微小的减速是不能避免的，飞船在飞行中的微小减速恰恰可以用来估算空间那些微小物质的密度，“微小减速”乃是很有用的物理信息，需要合理的解读，这同“平直空间”的理念相洽。

　　因此，宇宙飞船不可能按照等速度方式飞行。既然减速飞行，总有速度为零的时间和地点，这很自然；二是即使天空中没有任何物质而是“真空”，宇宙飞船也不会自由自在地按照绝对的、理论上的惯性遨游宇宙，原因在于，它同太阳之间并没有“解除”力的联系，双方的引力线相互作用形成引力，此力使离开太阳的飞船减少“径向速度”，结果飞船可能形成一个椭圆轨道，或者形成双曲线轨道，后者可以离开太阳系（如同有些彗星）。

　　按此可以推知，飞行器在空间是均匀地渐渐减速而不是到了120亿公里处忽然减速。不过，空间物质的密度极小，飞行器由此产生的减速也很小，在很长距离之后才比较明显。

因此，宇宙飞船“越走越慢”的内在原因是它不得不慢，是引力、阻尼力、使它相对于太阳系慢慢地降低速度。

　　宇宙飞船在空间减速和它能不能飞出太阳系，这是初速度、引力、阻尼力精确平衡的结果。只要测知有关常数，完全可以精确预见飞船轨道，并不存在绝对不能“飞出太阳系”的限制。

　　下面，再从另一方面，提出“壳”不可能存在的理由：

　1、关于宇宙间物质平均分布，星星大体上平均分布是重要证明，星星到底是图像还是实物？如果星星乃是120亿公里处“壳”上的图像，相当于提出了宇宙中的物质分布不均匀，天文学对于许许多多恒星不但测出了距离，而且测出了它们的运动，“宇宙平直”是长期天文测量的结论，而测量并不仅仅针对“图像”，而且涉及运动、力、光谱、温度等许多物理参量，天文望远镜已经看到、测量到100亿光年外的星体，而今轻率地说“那是大约0.001 光年(120亿公里)处的图像”其“根据”仅仅是“月亮上看不到星星”而不承认0.001 光年以外的所有天体，这可信吗？“壳”理论既不可信，宇宙星辰又否定不了，平直宇宙的理论就没有受到挑战，“平直宇宙”否定了空间某一个区域物质分布重大不均匀且形成一个巨大的“壳”。

　2、空间每一个大大小小的物体无不处在运动以及力的平衡中，没有一个物体可以不改变自己和周围物体的相对位置，而“120亿公里处的壳”，涉及远比恒星星系多的物质却似乎例外，这是违反了正常规则的例外，“壳理论”首先需要提出它能够成立的理由。否则，不能成立。

　3、每颗恒星都可以测得光谱和色温，只有真实的高温物质才能发出光谱，才能测得色温，因此，这其实否定了“星星乃是图像”的理论。通过光谱可以获知恒星的主要化学元素。如果望远镜中只是星星图像，不同星星的“图像”都是同一个“壳”上的不同亮点，其光谱会有所不同吗？

　4、天文测距属于实用科学技术，许多距离超过120 亿公里的恒星经过测量已经掌握了距离的具体数值，这些数值至少可用光学方法和时差法相互印证，是值得相信的数据。如：半人马座星据离是4.3光年，即40万亿公里，比那个所谓的“壳”直径大了三千多倍，体积大了300亿倍，这仅仅是离我们最近的恒星。可见，“壳理论”要求我们 无视科学成果而“管中窥豹”，在“九牛”身上只看到一根毛，其余统统都“仅仅是图像”！

　5、退一步说，即使真有那个“壳”，即使“壳”上的“亮点”是我们看到的星星，现在合计一下，那个亮点需要多么大、温度需要有多高才能让我们看到和测量到？不难发现，那个“图像”需要星体那么大，温度需要数千度以上，而绝非“放电影”可以搪塞。在此情况下，每一颗“图像”都有真的星体大，都具有高温，都符合天文上已经获知的物理参数，除了真实的星体，什么“影像”可以如此？

　6、不时有彗星进出视野，有的具有周期性，其轨道是椭圆，它属于太阳系，也有只出现一次的彗星，其轨道乃是双曲线，它不属于太阳系，彗星属于疏散物质聚合在一起的“星，”，它能够进出太阳系，就说明不存在那个“壳”

　7、天文上探测到的“引力波”、“超新星爆发”、“射电源”全都在远远超过120亿公里的空间，这同“壳”理论如何协调？

　　可以看出，产生“壳理论”属于“事出有因查无实据”，任何物理理论需要建立在“理”的基础之上，“存在问题”、“有困难”、“片面”、“悖理”、“无理”等现象都是不正确理论的表现。

　　至此，不难发现，所谓120亿公里处的那个“壳”实际上不能存在。

附： 

以往本网文章用标题、关键词搜索立即可以登录，二年多来，（除本文外）搜索已经进入不了，因此，类似“地球之水何从来？”“星体磁场何来？”“基本粒子到底有多少种？”“上帝粒子是什么‘粒子’？”“恒星从何而来？”“太阳磁场数月内能否180度翻转” ”黑洞真相等等许多陈理士（Chinese）物理观点，都不能直接从网上搜索到，使上网学者不能方便的获得这方面参考，对此，笔者向正努力解决此类物理学重要难题的学者致歉，系网络互联功能改变所致，无可奈何也！（2014.5）

 2019.3.24 加注： 本文于2011/2/7 登上本网站原先架构，2019.1月投入使用的现在的新架构未设计“加入时间、阅读次数”，故加注以保持原貌。

L42  Whether the solar system have a “hull”?

     Li Shuo Wei 　　 S. G. Chinese

Abstract current appeared “theory” of “the solar system have a hull of high density at the locate away about 12thpusand million km ” 、 “space have one solar system only, the rest stars to be the image and does not true”、etc. This text think of these “theory” to be the mistake theory of lack mechanism 

Key word the hull of solar system

　　“The solar system have a crust”、“cosmos only have a solar system, the rest stars to be the image and does not true ” and so on “theory” has been mull over several decades, its “foundation” was：the stars been out of sight on the moon, thus doubt the authenticity of existing of stars of cosmos, it is well for this “foundation” get secrecy formerly, cannot serve as “proving”, physical theory so got peace and tranquility this many years．Lately, at the same time of spread “the stars been out of sight on the moon”, theory of “solar system exist a hull” also appear on the academia haughtily

　　In those days, find out “red shift of remote stars”、particles cannot “exceed light velocity”、it is don’t know where come from the huge energy of mass、the trace of particle appear break off in Wilson cloud chamber and so on puzzles of make one “not understand”——for some people, so far seem “not understand” as before ——from this, raise “theory of mass(quality) variable” of the method of “rob Peter to pay Paul”, though it make folk feel above problems “already” got “answer”, but, due to there is not really seek out reason from physical mechanism, prior is discard two basic natural law of conservation of mass and conservation of energy, make imagine and imprudent theory can grandly reach in, such as：“red shift of remote star= remote star leave in high speed=big bang”、“before big bang, the whole masses of present cosmos are all compressed in a theoretical point ”、“in the quintuple space, our cosmos collide with hidden cosmos thus generate present cosmos”、“in the cosmic gross matter, dark matter dark energy occupy more than 90% ”、“the time can flex、step over、can form channel”、“the dimension of space has been exceed 11 ” and so on theory of belong to the type of “science fiction” grandly enter into main stream of physical theory． 

　　To measure with basic natural law, these “theory” not have one can find a footing, not have one can stately bring up out! It can be seen, modern physics at the same time of gain glory achievement, its basic theory also mix in moisture．

　　Now can far from two natural law (conservation of mass、conservation of energy) and from mechanism to explain those “puzzle” in those years, nobody can really prove “two conservation” have any point of not proper．Sane think, should we at once renew respect to the basic physical law? Or still continue not interfere the imagination soar in science fiction and let its “result” don’t suffer judge and enter into “theory”?

　　So you say these, ought to become a mirror, like that math field such serious、earnestly treat theory．The reality seem not like that, today, they find out when space ship reach to twelve thousand million kilo-meter its velocity has been greatly drop、the stars been out of sight on the moon, from this come out “The solar system have a crust”、“ cosmos only have a solar system”、“ the stars space which catch sight of on the earth to be the movie image and does not true” and so on “theory”．

　　For above “the stars been out of sight on the moon、airship slow down in space” and so on phenomenon need to analysis the reason from the angle of mechanism．Above “The solar system have a crust”、“ cosmos only have a solar system” clearly belong to the guess of gallop fancy, be the opinion and judgment of previous raise, such practice of sidedness hard to avoid continue “water injection” to the physical basic theory of has been “have moisture”．

Now analyze, what is the reason for the stars been out of sight on the moon and turn round the sun not in sight from besides of twelve thousand million kilo-meter? answer this two problems only need use basic theory of classical physics．

　　If in any case are all can catch sight of star on earth? No, only can catch sight in “night” sky, but the quantity of stars is related to moon’s have it or no、light or shade．In the night of the moon is bright and stars are few, the vast majority of stars are all “disappear” from the night sky! Why they before not doubt whether objective reality、only the “movie image”? if this due to rely on physics knowledge can believe in so star rare to be problem of vision contrast．

　　The light wave of remote star reach to earth already very weak, moreover, a remote star away for ten light year, its image in human retina only size at 10-6 (10 to the power of -6) mm, beyond the ability of visual discrimination, therefore, generally catch sight of remote stars does not the image generated by geometrical optics and that to be the diffracting speckle, the weak luminance of this speckle just can make vision nerve、photo negative film get “sensitization”．Therefore, to say from the angle of reasoning, there may be have more remote stars on account of farther along, so they not catch in sight of night sky , that is to say, the scale of cosmos possible more large than star map has been appeared．

　　 But the phenomenon of “the moon is bright and stars are few” seem cannot offer inspire．“the stars been out of sight on the moon” yet subvert idea of some scholastic, they believe in “not catch in sight” at one equal to “inexistence”．catch in sight at earth doesn’t count, from radio telescope can perceive、take in their electromagnetic wave、and the information of gravitational wave、cosmic rays and so on doesn’t count in same! 　　

　　Really，“the stars been out of sight on the moon” to be a phenomenon, need inflict analysis．Phenomenon’s different mean the condition some what different, what different for the earthly sky and the lunar sky? The main different lie in the earth periphery exist atmosphere and that moon hasn’t, go so far as to the cosmic dust, every where the sky both have． 

　　The atmosphere of earth sky scatter sun light by day, appear sky-blue, at night scatter moon light and appear dark-blue up to black；if only have the cosmic dust in sky, only few particle of reach to the length of light-wave can scatter sunlight, most weak, therefore, for the lunar sky of none atmosphere, the sky look like black in broad day, but due to the weak scatter of cosmic dust, will not absolutely black, and yet exceed the weak light-wave of remote star, this exactly the reason of the stars been out of sight on the black background of lunar day, if in the lunar night (none atmosphere), the sky should still black than the earth, the quantity of star in sky should more than the earth．

　　“The full moon night” of the earth, the night of the bright harvest moon can make the majority stars hidden and out of sight, could it be said that the rising sun in the lunar sky cannot catch sight of stars to be unusual? There fore, catch sight of star from earthly night sky and the star out of sight from the black background of lunar “day” separately exist the different reason, all should not make puzzle．

　　The both are all can catch star in sight in the “night”, and if use the same telescope, the star quantity catch in sight in the lunar “night” should more than the earth see

　　Owing to “the stars been out of sight on the moon” ——actually just the stars been out of sight at the lunar day——moreover negate the truth of cosmic stars which catch in sight from the night sky of earth, whether that is “have one leaf cover up eyes so not catch in sight the mount-Tai ”． 　

　　As for can or can’t catch sight of the sun away from twelve thousand million kilo-meter, it “can catch in sight” in theory, why the telescope of spacecraft when “turn around” not have catch sight of the sun? here need put into practice：right the whole stars all not catch in sight or only not catch in sight for the sun? and how much stability of which inertia system of telescope platform can reach? Can it guarantee when “turn around” the sun just in the visual field? If the instrument cannot guarantee this precision, now the sun in the telescope only equivalent to the Saturn catch sight on the earth, it does not special glow in that much stars of space, therefore, under this circumstance “not catch in sight” to be easy happened, “catch in sight” but need concentrate efforts． 

　　Above analyzed the reason of “the stars been out of sight on the moon”, explained each have the reason of “out of sight on the moon” and can see on the earth, no wander, should nod get the estimate of the stars to be only the image and not objective aster and “Solar system have hull”．

Besides, why the velocity of spacecraft greatly drop when arrive the locate of twelve thousand million kilo-meter? 

　　It has been measured the velocity of spacecraft does slight slow down in space and does not keep theoretic “inertia”．When arrive the locate of twelve thousand million kilo-meter, speed already close to zero．Why? Someone answer, over twelve thousand million kilo-meter there, material density very great, revolve the sun, become the “hull” of solar system, the farther deduction was： “space have one solar system only”, galaxy image only the “movie image” of reflect on the “hull” and does not true．

　　Existing theory really exist limit, difficult to explain discovered phenomenon, but existing theory also really have much sturdy part not allow ignore, if ignore them is equal to shut the window of know cosmos, like only catch in sight a drop of water from cosmic ocean if only catch in sight the solar system, whether it is too overstep．Persuade “numerous star systems” been objective existing not just catch sight of their image in the night sky and that was many much years study achievement in many ways．

　　About “why spacecraft be able to slow down when reach to the locate of twelve thousand million kilo-meter” become problem, be due to we think the spacecraft after leave solar system completely flying according to inertia, it seems must not slow down．Really, in the space absolute、theoretic inertia flying not existing, it have two major causes, the first is outer space “bestrew” electrons、cosmic dust、cosmic rays and spread interstellar matter, though the density very small, but make spacecraft get tiny slow down is inescapable, the tiny slow down of spacecraft just may use to estimate the density of those space tiny matters, “tiny slow down” to be the useful physical information, need reasonable unscramble, this be in harmony with “flat space” idea．

　　Therefore, spacecraft no way flying according to the method of uniform velocity．Since flying in slow down, always have the time and location of velocity equal to zero, it is natural；the second is even there is not any matter in sky but the vacuum, spacecraft also will not lightheartedly according to absolute、theoretic inertia flying travel in cosmos, the reason lie in, it does not “relieve” the force link with solar system, both attracting force-line act each other to form gravitation, this force make spacecraft reduce “radial velocity” when away with the sun, finally the spacecraft may form a elliptic orbit or hyperbola orbit, the rear can leave solar system (like some comet) ． 

　　Due to this may infer, spacecraft was evenly gradually slow down in space and does not reach to the locate of twelve thousand million kilo-meter suddenly slow down．But, the density of space matter is minimum, thus generated slow down of flying machine also was minimum, at very long distance able to relatively clear．

　　Therefore, the inherent reason of spacecraft “more walk more slowly” is it have to slow, to be the gravitation、damping force make it slowly under speed relative solar system．　

Whether spacecraft can or cannot fly off the solar system and slow down in space, it is the result of accurate balance of initial speed、gravitation、damping force．As along as sensing relative constant, fully may accurate foresee airship’s track, not exist the limit of “fly off the solar system ”．

The following, once more from another point of view, to raise the reason of the “hull” impossible existing：

　1 for the matter hypo-dispersion of cosmos, stars in general hypo-dispersion was the important proving, to the end whether the stars to be the image or matter? If stars to be the image on the “hull” at the locate of twelve thousand million kilo-meter, this amount to raised matter mal-distribution of cosmos, astronomy not only measured distance for lots and lots stars, but also measured their motion, “flat universe” was the conclusion of long-term astronomical surveying, and the measure not only aim at image, but also relate to motion、force、spectrum、temperature and so on many physical parameter, astronomical telescope has been saw and measured the aster outer 

Ten thousand million light-year, now rashly say “that is the image of outer about 0.001 light-year”, the “basis” nothing but “the stars been out of sight on the moon” and don’t recognize all asters outside of 0.001 light-year, does it credible? “Hull” theory neither credible, cosmos stars also negative not, theory of flat universe thus not suffer challenge, “flat universe” negate a certain area of space matter distribution great uneven and form a huge “hull”． 　

　2、space every matter of every size all without exception lie in motion and force balance, no matter can not change the relative position of itself with around object, yet “the hull at the locate of twelve thousand million kilo-meter”, it relate to the matter more then star system but seem in exception, this is the exception of contrary to normal regular, “hull theory” at first should raise the reason of if can founding．If not, it cannot founding．

　3、 every star can measured spectrum and color temperature, only true high temperature matter can issue spectrum, can measured color temperature, therefore, this in fact deny theory of “star to be image”．Through spectrum can find out star’s main chemical element．If only the image of stars in telescope, the different stars image are all the different bright spot on the same “hull”, should the spectrum may have different?

　4、 astronomical ranging belong to practical science and technology, many stars of distance exceed twelve thousand million kilo-meter through measure already get the specific value of distance, these value at least can use optics method and time lag method confirm each other, to be the value of worth believe．As：the distance of Centaurus is 4.3 light year, mean 40 trillion kilo-meter, it was large then that the diameter of so called “hull” more then 3000 times, the volume large 40 billion times, this only a matter of the nearest star leave us．Visible, “hull theory” require us ignore scientific gains but “have a limited view”, to the body of “nine cattle” only see a hair, the rest are all “nothing but the image”! 　

　5、To say the least, even really have that “hull”, even the “light spot” to be the star of we catch in sight, now reckon, how big about that light spot needed、how high temperature it needed can make us catch in sight and measured? Not difficult find, that “image” need big as a star, the temperature need over some thousands degree, and no at all “show a firm” can prevaricate．In this case, every piece of “image” all need big like a star, all possess high temperature, all in line with the physical parameter of astronomy already find out, other then real star, what “image” can so?

　6、 it often have the comet pass in and out the view, some possess periodicity, the track was oval, it belong to solar system, also have the comet of appear one-off, its track is hyperbola, it not belong to solar system, the comet is belong to the “star” of polymerizing together by evacuate matter, it can pass in and out of solar system, at once explain absent that “hull”．

　7、 the “gravitational wave”、“supernova outburst”、“radio source” of astronomy detect are all at the space of far surpass twelve thousand million kilo-meter, how can coordinate this with “hull” theory?

　　It can be seen, to produce “hull” theory belong to “there is good reason for it but it has been found that the report is not substantiated by facts”, any physical theory need build on the basis of “reason”, “exist problem”、“have difficulty”、“one-side”、“absurdity”、“unreasonable” and so on phenomenon are all the manifestation of wrong theory．

　　Thus, it’s not difficult find, what is called the “hull” of the locate off twelve thousand million kilo-meter to be out of thin air． 

Enclose：

Before use title or key word of article at browser do seeking can landing this website, for more than two years, (in addition of this article), do seeking already can’t landing, so, as “where come from the water of earth? ”“where come from the stars magnetic field?” “how many kinds of basic particle to the end?” “what particle was the God particle?” “where come from the stars?” “whether sun’s magnetic field can turn 180 degree at several months? ” the truth of “black hole” and so on viewpoint of “Chinese physics” are all can't directly from the Internet to search, make Internet scholars not convenient for the reference, for this here to apologize scholars are trying to solve such important physics problems, is due to network connection function change, helpless! （2014.5）